tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post2398519101328438485..comments2024-03-22T18:43:00.710-04:00Comments on Unam Sanctam Catholicam: Pope Francis and the Sin of SaulBonifacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10672810254075072214noreply@blogger.comBlogger20125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-50453870165840577402016-02-10T08:59:27.061-05:002016-02-10T08:59:27.061-05:00As a NON-Scripture scholar but simply as one from ...As a NON-Scripture scholar but simply as one from a background in which the Bible was (by many of us) read straight through and a great deal of study was done on passages, subjects and so forth, I can say that the simplest mind who has read the Old Testament would agree with you totally as to WHY Saul was rejected as king -- and agree with you on all the rest of it, though not knowing the terminology of that type of warfare. My protestant husband knew instantly what was wrong with what the Pope said in that instance. (I am a convert.)Sharonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10567660203137647882noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-57868864237688892742016-02-03T07:18:48.041-05:002016-02-03T07:18:48.041-05:00I agree with that. It does not make sense to impug...I agree with that. It does not make sense to impugn Bergoglio alone without all his predecessors, who did much of the same stuff. Which is why Francis is the true Pope. Bonifacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10672810254075072214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-15457066071556281852016-02-03T04:55:56.108-05:002016-02-03T04:55:56.108-05:00Well, have you read what popes in the past have ca...Well, have you read what popes in the past have called indifference and false ecumenism tantamount to? The first commandment doesn't change just because "Saint" JPII felt like being kind. It's simply not possible to reject Jorge and not his predecessors. If Jorge is a heretic they're just as bad. I'm pretty sure that most traditional Catholics already believe he is a heretic but call him pope, as if someone without the Catholic faith can be the pope.<br /><br />Jorge clearly serves the one worlders. Calling it a conspiracy theory doesn't make it any less true. Maria Divine Mercy did call out Jorge before he became "Pope". But like I said if Francis is a heretic so is Benedict"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-75720237806839647542016-02-02T14:30:06.473-05:002016-02-02T14:30:06.473-05:00Apostasy is not doing something contrary or damagi...Apostasy is not doing something contrary or damaging to faith; it is the formal and explicit rejection of the Christian Faith. Francis has certainly not repudiated Christianity, regardless of how poorly he presents it. <br /><br />As for MDM, how could you even be tempted? It is SOOO stupid. She has been outed as this Irish broad Mary Carberry who was just bilking people out of money with shell companies selling trinkets. The whole operation has folded. Bonifacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10672810254075072214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-41489007693024335472016-02-02T11:45:17.731-05:002016-02-02T11:45:17.731-05:00Tempted to accept Maria Divine Mercy but I really ...Tempted to accept Maria Divine Mercy but I really don't understand the logic behind rejecting Jorge but accepting every man after the death of Pius XII. You don't think that it's an act of apostasy to worship with false religions or treat them indifferently? Apostasy is as much of an act of rejecting the faith as formal heresy!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-56129369883723642642016-01-25T06:52:29.523-05:002016-01-25T06:52:29.523-05:00Below could be the reason for the pope's slip ...Below could be the reason for the pope's slip of mind or possibly the sleight of tongue. Time will tell.<br /><br />Is God planning for new scenery and new leadership? The increasing flooding around the world is one of the signs, among many others, we are to look for: daniel1021-thebookoftruth.blogspot.com/p/welcome.html<br />Book of Truth mini-webcast, part one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvRpHDlGsyc<br />Book of Truth mini-webcast, part two: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ud07pzKoA9I<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-50671596879391553562016-01-24T11:11:43.528-05:002016-01-24T11:11:43.528-05:00True, true...but amending the rite to include wome...True, true...but amending the rite to include women hardly constitutes changing the whole rite into something new.Bonifacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10672810254075072214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-55459673196785700222016-01-24T01:02:05.057-05:002016-01-24T01:02:05.057-05:00Council of Trent
Session 7 Canon 13
Look it up :)...Council of Trent <br />Session 7 Canon 13<br />Look it up :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-58949135168024016792016-01-23T09:10:12.298-05:002016-01-23T09:10:12.298-05:00'“obstinate rebels” who “resist change”'
...'“obstinate rebels” who “resist change”'<br /><br />Strangely, this appears to be exactly what the Lord commands when He instructs us to choose Him or the World.<br /><br />All too often people mistake the argument from tradition for the argument from Tradition.<br /><br />The argument from tradition, as termed by Ayn Rand I believe, is to say that something is good because it is old. This is obviously fallacious.<br /><br />However, the argument from Tradition is not appealing to the age of a given thing, but its perennial truth. For instance, arguing for Patriarchy is not based on the fact that is is a 5000 year old system of sex relations in civilized society between men and women, but instead is based on the fact that is appears universally in civilizations across that time period without exception until the Modern era, belying a grounding in human design.<br /><br />Who has changed the world? Who has shaped the world we live in today that we ought to honor by adapting to their demands of the Christian faithful? The atheistic butchers of the French Revolution, of Soviet Russia?! If we resisted their violence when it was breaking down the door, then what argument remains to say that we should acquiesce to the hurt and damage they left as a scar upon the land with their evil?Clear Watershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01067495451323861530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-71920399112264881682016-01-22T15:41:45.374-05:002016-01-22T15:41:45.374-05:00People should not be surprised by anything Pope Fr...People should not be surprised by anything Pope Francis says and does. Through the grace of the Holy Spirit he won't teach authoritatively anything to be held as a belief by the universal Church but other than that he will be a true, blue Jesuit. When he was elected my first thought was "God help us, they've elected a Jesuit." Francis was educated and formed as a Jesuit 40-50 years ago. From at least the 40s onward the Jesuits were imbibing in the evolution-based theology fiction of Teilhard de Chardin, S.J. Then there was John Courtney Murray, S.J. The rot in the Jesuits was chronicled in the 1980s in books such as The Jesuits by Malachi Martin and The Pope and the Jesuits by James Hitchcock. In the 70s we watched in horror as Congressman Robert Drinan, S.J. voted for abortion and became the media's "go to guy" on life issues without rebuke from his Jesuit superior. We saw constant dissent on everything and anything that had anything to do with sex being constantly published in the Jesuit magazine, America, which has preached the condemned doctrine of liberation theology for decades.Consider what the Jesuit Universities have become. Don't expect that leopard Francis to change his spots. He's everything the Jesuits are.T. McFadden, Sr.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-10879995211927833952016-01-21T20:37:14.970-05:002016-01-21T20:37:14.970-05:00Thank you - good article on herem warfare a.k.a. p...Thank you - good article on herem warfare a.k.a. putting a city/people "under a ban."<br /><br />This Pope has form on corrupt exegesis. Remember the Pharisees who opposed divorce and remarriage, Our Lord lying to his disciples on the road to Emmaus; Our Lady doing goodness knows what at the foot of the Cross, the sinful little Lord running off to the Temple at the age of 12?<br /><br />Its obvious he has never read Pastor Aeternus, but it does fill one with wonder how a man so ignorant of Scripture could ascend to the See of Peter. This must surely be a supernatural pontificate. Deacon Augustinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03549825303646357455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-51240303847212624632016-01-21T16:19:09.138-05:002016-01-21T16:19:09.138-05:00But (here's the catch) Unam Sanctum is only ab... But (here's the catch) Unam Sanctum is only able to derive his own meaning from the text through use of a traditional method of exegesis wherein words mean things. What is needed is an innovative interpretation.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14595352596533167315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-8928286999778362452016-01-21T10:25:03.322-05:002016-01-21T10:25:03.322-05:00This means Pope Francis actually got it entirely b...<i>This means Pope Francis actually got it entirely backward</i><br /><br />I am shocked, shocked that PF would get something wrong to further his own agenda!c mattnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-24145300220424294362016-01-21T10:24:23.686-05:002016-01-21T10:24:23.686-05:00Another interpretation of why Francis is distortin...Another interpretation of why Francis is distorting Scripture is that he knows exactly what he is doing and is counting on the masses to take his distorted exegesis as authentic simply because 'the pope says so'. Do not assume that he is innocent of such deception. He is as clever as the devil.Barbara Jensenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16566610653008240239noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-80634828821319149232016-01-21T10:03:15.853-05:002016-01-21T10:03:15.853-05:00I LOLd when i saw the post labels :DI LOLd when i saw the post labels :DMarko Ivančičevićhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04579400863718513875noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-24691936062640834382016-01-21T05:19:08.420-05:002016-01-21T05:19:08.420-05:00"Sorry I have not posted for a while…we are a..."Sorry I have not posted for a while…we are a family of seven and over the past two weeks every single one of us has been sick multiple times. It’s been one of those “barely keeping my head above water” sorts of months."<br /><br />You really think "sorry" is enough to excuse me not having a temporary fix of new posts during my hours of having nothing to do every day, every week? IT IS NOT.<br /><br />Shape up, Bonifake.JE ACCUSEnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-73846996479665640302016-01-20T17:25:28.338-05:002016-01-20T17:25:28.338-05:00Thank you for this clarification. Putting the who...Thank you for this clarification. Putting the whole scene into context now makes sense out of why Saul was rejected as king by God. I remembered this reading from daily Mass and was confused when I read the Pope's 'interpretation' of the passage. Thank you, again for the bible study lesson. Laurelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02231865228884547577noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-38272251456712447632016-01-20T16:34:24.804-05:002016-01-20T16:34:24.804-05:00Absolutely. I don't believe I hold the copyrig...Absolutely. I don't believe I hold the copyright :)!Murrayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12747213382322731103noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-25391943885351685242016-01-20T16:14:44.691-05:002016-01-20T16:14:44.691-05:00Oh wow. Thanks. May I incorporate that into the ar...Oh wow. Thanks. May I incorporate that into the articles, Murray?Bonifacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10672810254075072214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-71879139303310061022016-01-20T16:04:31.576-05:002016-01-20T16:04:31.576-05:00Interestingly, I read this passage this morning, D...Interestingly, I read this passage this morning, Dt 25:17-19:<br /><br /><i>17 “Remember what Am′alek did to you on the way as you came out of Egypt, 18 how he attacked you on the way, when you were faint and weary, and cut off at your rear all who lagged behind you; and he did not fear God. 19 Therefore when the Lord your God has given you rest from all your enemies round about, in the land which the Lord your God gives you for an inheritance to possess, <b>you shall blot out the remembrance of Am′alek from under heaven; you shall not forget</b>.</i><br /><br />So, far from being a surprise, the command to eradicate the Amalekites was established many decades (centuries?) beforehand.Murrayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12747213382322731103noreply@blogger.com