tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post8902565059825333200..comments2024-03-22T18:43:00.710-04:00Comments on Unam Sanctam Catholicam: The Cannibalism ArgumentBonifacehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10672810254075072214noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-76246697468842838412017-04-05T14:12:41.048-04:002017-04-05T14:12:41.048-04:00In other words, we Pharisees once again got caught...In other words, we Pharisees once again got caught up in the letter of the law, and ignored the spirit of the law.<br /><br />Christi pax.Lucretiushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00685308727148242500noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-18977360956515851152017-04-05T14:07:17.988-04:002017-04-05T14:07:17.988-04:00Here is a way to make Dr. Hahn's argument bett...Here is a way to make Dr. Hahn's argument better: why did God not want us to drink human blood? Because that is the "currency" of life, and for whatever reason, God thinks that consuming human life in that way is wrong. <br /><br />But the whole point of the Incarnation is God sharing His Life with man! We consume the Blood because it is Christ's Life, it is God's Life. We consume it precisely to share in the Divine Life.<br /><br />Christi pax.Lucretiushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00685308727148242500noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-58413258516392430622010-02-09T19:01:28.276-05:002010-02-09T19:01:28.276-05:00Nvale-
In the Eucharist, there is a "third p...Nvale-<br /><br />In the Eucharist, there is a "third party", so to speak, and that is the accidental properties of the bread and wine, which remain and render so that the flesh is not consumed under the form of flesh, but under the sacramental signs of bread and wine.Bonifacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10672810254075072214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-75596155181537954972010-02-09T17:37:02.555-05:002010-02-09T17:37:02.555-05:00I dont think this interpretation is correct. this ...I dont think this interpretation is correct. this particular sacrament hinges on a principle known as transubstantiation in which followers of the catholic faith truly believe that the bread and wine are transformed into the flesh and blood of christ. The argument of flesh under the form of flesh only applies when a third party is present, the shark eats the human flesh, and then someone eats the shark. However in the catholic sacrament, which bread and wine become flesh and blood, those participating eat it directly and once again according to catholic doctrine, they truly believe the bread and wine is flesh and blood. its cannibalismnvale002https://www.blogger.com/profile/02260147763774124051noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-21085164886835495752010-02-09T17:32:13.304-05:002010-02-09T17:32:13.304-05:00I don't think this explanation is correct. The...I don't think this explanation is correct. The principle of transubstantiation states that the bread in wine inn the sacrament of communion is truly transformed into the body and blood of christ, even though to our senses it is still bread and wine. This under the form of flesh argument incorporates a third party to, for lack of a better word, negate cannibalism i.e. consumption of flesh by the shark and then by people. However as states previously this sacrament hinges on the principle of transubstantiation and the belief that the bread and wine is truly transformed and then consumed directly. it's cannibalism.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-39324303299920202292008-11-12T08:37:00.000-05:002008-11-12T08:37:00.000-05:00The Eucharist/canibalism argument has been present...The Eucharist/canibalism argument has been presented to me before and in my mind I knew that this interpretation was absurd but for the life of me I could not articulate my response. Thank you for the simple and precise answer to this ridiculous allegation.About This Blog.https://www.blogger.com/profile/07115316490035054481noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086833995941525990.post-7699829874460963822008-02-25T14:34:00.000-05:002008-02-25T14:34:00.000-05:00that horrible photo, please remove it!that horrible photo, please remove it!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com