Thursday, February 06, 2025

The Unconditional Obligation of Forgiveness


If there is one thing that the Gospel makes abundantly clear, it is our obligation to forgive others. Christ warns us plainly in the Sermon on the Mount, "For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father also will forgive you; but if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses" (Matt. 6:14-15), and "Judge not, and you will not be judged; condemn not, and you will not be condemned; forgive, and you will be forgiven" (Luke 6:37). Christians are to be people who, in the spirit of Christ, "turn the other cheek" (Matt. 5:39), remembering that Christ, even as He was being crucified, called out, "Father forgive them for they know not what they do" (Luke 23:34).

We are warned sternly that failure to forgive will result in our own condemnation, as the parable says,  "Then his lord summoned him and said to him, 'You wicked servant! I forgave you all that debt because you besought me; and should not you have had mercy on your fellow servant, as I had mercy on you?' (Matt. 18:32-33). Our own forgiveness is entirely contingent upon our own willingness to forgive, and this is directly related to our Lord's own munificence in forgiving us. "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us" says the Lord's Prayer. St. Paul, too, says, "Bearing with one another and, if one has a complaint against another, forgiving each other; as the Lord has forgiven you, so you also must forgive" (Col. 3:13). In the parable of the wicked servant, after the hard-hearted servant is cast into jail, Jesus says, "So will my heavenly Father do to you, unless each of you forgives his brother from his heart" (Matt. 18:35)

This is incredibly fundamental, such that I am actually unaware of any Christian sect that does not affirm the obligation of Christians to forgive those who sin against them. It is, therefore, shocking to me the number of times that I have seen Christians blatantly refuse to forgive. How many times in my life I have sincerely and contritely told someone "I'm sorry" only to hear them say, "Okay." How many times I see people nurturing grudges and going out of their way to keep them hot; how many times I have heard Christians plainly tell me, "I can't forgive him." It should be appalling to anyone with Christian sensibilities.

When someone comes to you and says they are sorry, the appropriate response is, "I forgive you." If someone abases themself even further and says, "Will you forgive me?" the only correct answer is yes. And this is where the issue gets tricky, because people sometimes think the obligation to forgive is conditional—that is, they will say, "I will forgive such-and-such when they are truly sorry." They make their own exercise of forgiveness contingent upon the contrition of the one who has offended them. This essentially shifts the burden of forgiveness to the offender; "I would forgive you if you were sufficiently contrite." Besides being unbiblical (nowhere do we see the Gospel tether forgiveness to the actions of the penitent), this approach is too subjective. How do we decide when the offender is sufficiently sorry? What if he apologizes to the best of his ability and strives to make amends but we, in the hardness of our hearts, are still unsatisfied? What level of abasement and sorrow is sufficient? By this criteria, we could justify ourselves withholding forgiveness forever just because we don't judge the offender penitent enough. It is akin to saying, "I will forgive you when I feel like it." But the simplest argument against this point is simply this: we are to forgive as Christ forgave us, and Christ died for us and forgave us while we were yet sinners (cf. Rom. 5:8, Luke 23:34). We are to do no less.

Another objection people make against forgiving has to do with the sincerity of the act itself. We are obligated to forgive one another "from the heart" (cf. Matt. 18:35). That is, the act of forgiveness must be sincere, not an empty formality done under religious pretext. As C.S. Lewis says in The Four Loves,  "To say to one who expects a renewal of Affection, Friendship, or Eros, ‘I forgive you as a Christian’ is merely a way of continuing the quarrel. Those who say it are of course lying." [1] Forgiveness must be entirely sincere.

All well and good, but this presents us with a dilemma: what if we find ourselves unable to forgive "from the heart"? If forgiveness must be from the heart, then it cannot simply be turned on and off like a lightswitch. It is not as simple as saying yes or no; it is an entire volitional movement that has complex emotions behind it. Generally it takes time to process the act of forgiveness, at least if we intend it to be sincere. Our timeline for forgiveness may not align with the offender's penitence. We thus have situations where one who has offended comes to us penitent and apologetic, but we feel like we are not at a place where forgiveness can be proferred. This is not due to any hardness of heart, but simply to the fact that we do not feel we have forgiven them and hence we worry that our forgiveness may not be sincere—that it has not come "from the heart." And therefore we withhold granting forgiveness, in the thought that we will forgive them later when we are more emotionally invested in the act.

While I do understand and sympathize with this concern, I still believe it to be an incorrect approach. We misunderstand the declaration of forgiveness if we consider it only as a profession of a fact, of something already completed. While this might have been the case for our Divine Lord when He declared His forgivenes from the cross, such is seldom the case with concupiscent men. With us, our declaring something is often an imperfect act. It is something that must be worked for. Speaking our forgiveness is an integral part of this. The same act by which we declare it is so gives us the impetus to make it so. 

To use an example: in the Gospel, the father of the demoniac says to Jesus, "Lord, I believe; help my unbelief" (Mark 9:24). On its face, this is quite an extraordinary statement. The man professes belief while simultaneously admitting he lacks it. Are not these two phrases contradictory? Certainly not, for belief—like forgiveness and many other human acts—can be more or less perfect. "Lord, I believe; help my unbelief" means, "Lord, I have the kernel of belief, but grant that I may believe more devoutly. I know I should trust you, but my trust is imperfect; grant that it may be perfected. I know in my mind that you can do all things; help that I may not only know it in my mind but be convinced of it in my heart." 

Such statements as these are not only declarative but performative. They declare what exists in a very imperfect way, while simultaneously professing our desire that it should be perfected. When we repeat our baptismal vows and say, "I reject Satan," we do not mean that we have definitively repudiated sin in the past and have no need of any further repudiation; rather, we are reaffirming our commitment to a continual process. We declare what we intend, and by doing so, solidify our resolution to that effect with the help of God's grace. 

Understanding this, we can see why it would be foolish to, for example, refuse to recite the Creed on Sunday because our faith is wavering—or refuse to renew our baptismal vows because we have not perfectly rejected sin, or refuse to say "I love you" because our love is marred by struggle. Similarly, it would be wrong to refuse a declaration of forgiveness because we aren't sure if we "really mean it." Merely speaking the words is performative; the words help bring into being what we desire. If we don't truly feel forgiving, saying the words is the first step towards attaining that goal. Like the man who says, "Lord I believe, help my unbelief," our, "I forgive you" often means, "I choose the path of forgiveness—even if it is imperfect, even if I am still angry, even if I still have work to do, I choose to forgive. And that path begins today, right here."

And that is sincerity. That is from the heart.

So, I beg of you, forgive freely, forgive generously, and forgive quickly. 

NOTES

[1] C.S. Lewis, The Four Loves (Harper Collins: San Francisco, 2017), 168-69


13 comments:

Marissa said...

This is something I've been thinking a lot about lately, so a very timely post. I wonder sometimes have a truly forgiven someone who has wronged me if I continually ruminate on the hurt they've caused.

I remember stumbling upon this website about St. Maria Goretti and forgiveness and found it very helpful. You could definitely write even more expansively on this topic.

Gaius said...

Are we still obliged to forgive if the other party doesn't ask for forgiveness? The sacramental absolution analogy given above would suggest otherwise, but I'm not really very well versed in this area of theology.

Boniface said...

It seems that Christ's example from the Cross obliges us to forgive all men, regardless of whether they ask for forgiveness or not. I personally think arguments to the contrary generally boil down to sophistry.

Anonymous said...

CHRYSOSTOM. Because the Lord had said, Pray for them that persecute you, (Matt. 5:44.) this likewise He did, when He ascended the cross, as it follows, Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them, not that He was not able Himself to pardon them, but that He might teach us to pray for our persecutors, not only in word, but in deed also. But He says, Forgive them, if they should repent. For He is gracious to the penitent, if they are willing after so great wickedness to wash away their guilt by faith.

Anonymous said...

See # 1154 Denzinger

Ignorance is no excuse

PS. Love your blog

Boniface said...

@ Anon, " But He says, Forgive them, if they should repent." Sorry Chrysostom, that's literally not what Jesus said haha. Why would Chrysostom add the clause "if they should repent" to our Lord's words when that's not what He says?

I'm not sure how Denzinger 1154 is relevant; that has to do with the forgiveness people receive (or don't) receive from God, not the personal acts of forgiveness we make to others. This post has nothing to do with obtaining forgiveness from God.

'PS. Love your blog"

Thank you!

Gaius said...

@ Anon, " But He says, Forgive them, if they should repent." Sorry Chrysostom, that's literally not what Jesus said haha. Why would Chrysostom add the clause "if they should repent" to our Lord's words when that's not what He says?

Presumably because, since God sends unrepentant sinners to Hell, in commanding us to forgive people who don't repent he'd be commanding us to be more forgiving than he is himself, which seems counterintuitive.

GranmaBern Bern said...

I was taught that, since no prayer of Christ could ever go unanswered, this prayer He made on the Cross effectively obtained the conversion and repentance of those He was praying for.

Love the sinner, hate the sin.

Both of you are correct and the contradiction is only apparent because of our limited human intelligence and the fact that God is Eternal whereas we are stuck in time.

Anonymous said...

I think Chrysostom’s exegesis is his way of telling his followers what Jesus meant.

I don’t see how he is wrong,

We know that there were Old Testament sacrifices for sins committed out of ignorance and in The Divine Liturgy of St James we pray for forgiveness of sins committed with or without our full knowledge and we know that Trent teaches there is no absolution absent penance and we know from Denzinger # 327 that ignorance is no excuse

I will continue to think about this

Thank you

Anonymous said...

I've always understood forgiveness as the releasing of any debt that was created by a sin. This is something we can do for even an unrepentent sinner and we are clearly called to do this as Christians. If someone steals from you, you do not expect repayment. If someone damages your reputation, you do not seek to damage theirs etc.

Things get complicated for a few reasons...

First, sins against us also cause pain. This pain can be physical or emotional. It does not seem to me that this pain (even the emotional kind) can be released in an act of will like a debt can. Rather, it needs to be healed. This pain is made worse when the offender is unrepentent. It also seems to me that this pain can cause us to renege on our prior forgiveness. This pain transforms the act of forgiveness from a one time ordeal into a constant process. It also very much complicates forgiveness granted to people we continue to encounter in our lives. That is to say, it is one thing to forgive the criminal who broke into our car who you will never see again; it is another to forgive a spouse. Which brings me to the next complication: prior relationships.

Accompanying an act of forgiveness, there is often an expectation of reconciliation. This expectation can come from either the offending or the offended. Are we called to reconcile with everyone who has wronged us and restore relationships to their previous status? Must we accept the cheating spouse back into our home? Must we invite that old friend over for dinner after he stole from us? Pain caused by the sin can make this feel impossible, and so often doing this would be a foolish invitation to more damage. Which brings us to a third complication: reckless permissiveness or even enableance of sin.

What should we do when offering forgiveness will obviously lead to more sin? Consider the mother who keeps bringing her drug addicted son back into her home after the son has repeatedly stolen from her to fund his addiction. This form of forgiveness is not good for anyone. Further, how are we supposed to deal with sins against others? This can be appplied at an individual level, such as a sibling of the drug addict mentioned above defending their mother. Or, at the societal level where government must act justly to punish sin and protect innocents. We are called to turn our own cheek to the offender, but are we also called to do this for our children?

Even after sins are forgiven and wounds are healed, scars will remain. These scars could take many forms such as a ruined friendship or even a legal divorce. I wonder if understanding the difference between a scar and failure to forgive is crucial. It's something I don't fully grasp and am still praying with. More importantly, I need to find a way to act with love and charity in spite of hurt and scars.

I don't know man... Sorry for the rambling. True forgiveness doesn't feel like something we can do on own. Only by the grace of God can we get there.

Anonymous said...

I continue to think St John Chrysostom is right

Jesus warns the Jews of Jerusalem - Luke 19 - their city and families would be destroyed yet undoubtedly there were Jews there who were ignorant about Jesus

Why were they also not forgiven but suffered and died most horrible deaths?

I think the doctor of the church is right.

Adult Jews had no excuse for their ignorance for rejecting the Messias to say noting about conspiring to kill Him

The notes in Haydock’s Douay ST Matthew reflect this
9:4
10:5-
12:31
21:45
22:18
22:43-45

Boniface said...

@Anon I am not sure why you are confusing our obligation to repent *to God* in order to be forgiven and the forgiveness that we must extend to our fellow men. All the passages you are citing are about people being punished by God for not repenting and have nothing to do with our obligation to forgive our brethren. It's like you're making them into one singular reality when they are not.

Anonymous said...

Sorry, my mistake in assuming my silence about that signals agreement

I completely agree with you on our duty to forgive - if it doesn’t include Joy Reid